On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:06:56PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To be truthful, I'd not even thought of pdf(la)tex. Yes, this may be a > reasonable solution...expect that it produces pdf, not ps, files. I'm > not sure, but I think that to print pdf files to my postscript printer > they first would need to be converted to ps let your print spooler handle it
> I'm really not all that > familiar with pdf, except that I know that xpdf doesn't display type3 > fonts properly so dont use Type3 fonts.... > and acroread is huge and slow. a matter of opinion? >Is there some overwhelming > reason to use pdf instead of ps? yes, because we have pdftex but we dont have pstex! PDF is the way things are going, because its much simpler than PS for software writers -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
