My original reply to Bernhard was rejected by his server, so I'm forwarding it to the list.
--Don Simons -----Original Message----- From: Don Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TeX-music] PMX and scor2prt problem This is a good bug. I'll fix it in the next release. Thanks for finding it. This must mean that until now, no one has used a movement break in a score with ten or more instruments. --Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernhard Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:19 AM > To: Don Simons > Subject: RE: [TeX-music] PMX and scor2prt problem > > > Hi Don > > I'm again on the brumel mass. Using the M option in a line/page break I > get now always > > ! Missing number, treated as zero. > <to be read again> > * > \setname #1#2->[EMAIL PROTECTED] #1 > \relax \expandafter \edef \csname > instrument\romannume... > l.540 \setname*{} > % > > and in the corresponding tex-file I find > > \setname1{}% > \setname2{}% > \setname3{}% > \setname4{}% > \setname5{}% > \setname6{}% > \setname7{}% > \setname8{}% > \setname9{}% > \setname*{}% > \setname*{}% > \setname*{}% > > I suppose there's a problem when overcoming ten instruments? > > regards > Bernhard > > _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
