Hi all, 

I've found a suspicious code on this problem.

musixlyr.tex(2.1c) redefine a internal command '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
at line 649.

musixuad also redefine '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to make make slurs 
independent from \maxinstruments at line 230.

So, please check your tex file:
(1) ....
    \input musixuad.tex
    \input musixlyr.tex
    ....
will be OK,

(2) ....
    \input musixlyr.tex
    \input musixuad.tex
    ....
will be NG (lyrics may not be flushed).

Many thanks to Hermann, I should put self-exclusion code 
into musixuad.tex for such case ASAP...

Best regards,

----
Hiroaki MORIMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Tokyo, Japan


Hermann Hinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, 20. M舐z 2008 22:46 schrieb Christian Mondrup:
> > Hermann Hinsch wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 19. M舐z 2008 20:22 schrieb Don Simons:
> > >> I can't right off hand think of any tricks that will work, but someone
> > >> else may.
> > >>
> > >> If you want to get into the code and recompile it, be my guest. The
> > >> place to start is to globally search and replace "nm=12" with "nm=14"
> > >> (12 voices plus two staves--I assume--for the B.C.). But I can virtually
> > >> guarantee you that that alone won't do the trick; you'll just have to
> > >> follow the error messages.
> > >>
> > >> Also, I'm not so sure that MusiXTeX will allow more than 12 instruments,
> > >> although it may allow more than 12 total voices if there are no more
> > >> than 12 instruments.
> > >>
> > >> --Don Simons
> > >
> > > Many thanks to all who answered on my problem.
> > >
> > > Don, I changed nm=12 to nm=13 and compiled pmxab.f and you are quite
> > > right that this didnエ t work. Then I included musixuad as Hiroaki
> > > suggested but as I am using tetex and not etex musixuad excludes itself.
> >
> > the terms 'tetex' and 'etex' are not immediately comparable. 'tetex'
> > denotes a complete port of a full TeX system, while 'tex' and 'etex' are
> > the names of base TeX interpreters (etex: extended tex). Actually tetex
> > comes with etex.
> >
> > So maybe you should after all give the combination of a patched pmx,
> > etex and musixuad a chance
> 
> Christian, I did so and at the first glance it works as it should but in some 
> places a shift of the lyric line over several bars occurs. After returning  
> to 12 voices without the stave for the b.c these shifts disappear only if 
> musixuad is not included.
> 
> But without the 13. stave for the b.c. there is another problem : The last 
> lyric line is partly positioned into the last stave. A Space ... in the 
> preamble has no effect because the last stave is the end of the page. 
> 
> So I am a little frustated using M-Tx in this project. 
> 
> Hermann
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TeX-music mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to