Stefan Creaser said:

>The only *fair* way of doing it would be to split the money equally between 
>the two so that no bias can be perceived for or against either organisation...

      What's wrong with bias?  If one of the properties is more desirable to 
Texas cavers as a whole, then that's where the money should go.  People and 
organizations show bias in giving donations and grants all the time.  It's a 
matter of priorities and preferences.  Nothing wrong with that.

Mark Minton

Reply via email to