Stefan Creaser said: >The only *fair* way of doing it would be to split the money equally between >the two so that no bias can be perceived for or against either organisation...
What's wrong with bias? If one of the properties is more desirable to Texas cavers as a whole, then that's where the money should go. People and organizations show bias in giving donations and grants all the time. It's a matter of priorities and preferences. Nothing wrong with that. Mark Minton