I agree that it’s put up or shut up, but there is also a competence thing going 
on, too. There need to be incentives for being competent, and disincentives for 
screwing everyone who is depending on you, and disincentives for dictatorships.
katie arens
On Oct 26, 2016, at 16:02, Stefan Creaser via Texascavers 
<texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com>> wrote:

I think Don’s point was “put up or shut up”.

Lots of people are swift to criticize, but are then back of the queue when 
volunteering to help…

Stefan Creaser
Staff Design Engineer; Physical Design Group; ARM
5707 Southwest Parkway, Bldg 1, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78735, USA.
Direct: +1-512-314-1012, Internal: 11012.
Email: stefan.crea...@arm.com<mailto:stefan.crea...@arm.com>. Skype: 
stefan_creaser

From: Texascavers [mailto:texascavers-boun...@texascavers.com] On Behalf Of 
Sheryl Rieck via Texascavers
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:00 PM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com>
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] The Texas Caver

These folks are volunteers. You should appreciate volunteers for the effort 
they put into whatever task they own. They certainly aren't doing it for the 
admiration. Otherwise, pay someone. Or do it yourself.
Sheryl Rieck
sheryl.ri...@gmail.com<mailto:sheryl.ri...@gmail.com>

"You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime, you just might 
find you get what you need" Rolling Stones

On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Don Arburn via Texascavers 
<texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com>> wrote:
As a trained and educated artist, recent volunteer Texas Cavers Reunion cat 
herder, and past Texas Caver Editor (a particularly thankless job) I have 
always found plenty of folks to endlessly criticize or complain, it's an 
integral part of the job and one learns to recognize the difference between 
"criticism" & "opinion". However, novices (volunteers who stepped up to do a 
job when no one else would) aren't usually trained or skilled or ready to deal 
with criticism. It can be counterproductive.


At TCR typically I ask critics to step up and help solve whatever they think 
isn't happening to their expectation. One of two things happens; they step up 
and do something -or- they shut up and do nothing. In my experience the vast 
majority of complainers choose the latter.


At TCR, lots of people voice ideas about how it -should- be done, and I get 
tons of criticism of how "it got done wrong", or how "it should be done in the 
future" or how "it was done better in the past". Plenty of suggestions, oodles 
of constructive ideas. But when it come time for those same volunteers to step 
up and stand behind their suggestions and help - very very few ever follow 
through. Ever. They usually disappear with the words "how about helping out 
then?" The ones that actually see the job done are the ones who want it done 
and do it.


Criticism can be constructive, such as when someone expects it or asks for it. 
Or the critic is willing to step in and help firsthand, which is usually 
welcomed. Especially useful are wisdom and experience. Otherwise it's just 
opinion.


When someone is struggling on the side of a busy highway trying to change a 
flat tire, it's real easy to drive past and shout out the window "lift with 
your knees!"

--Don



--Don
On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Carl Kunath via Texascavers 
<texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:texascavers@texascavers.com>> wrote:
The Texas Caver

So here we go again with the Texas Caver.  Every few years we are seeking a new 
editor or at least discussing options that might disburse the rowdy crowds that 
are assembling at the gates with torches and pitchforks.

What is gong on here?  Why is it that every few years there is a Texas Caver 
crisis and a less than graceful transition to a new editor?

There is lots of talk about the Texas Caver.  From the outset, there seems to 
have been some confusion regarding the difference between good journalism and 
nice graphic arts. Unfortunately, neither has been regularly in evidence.  
Maybe I've missed it, but I can't recall anyone praising the Caver for high 
quality journalism or the reliability of production.  The editor has a few 
passionate defenders who are willing to do battle with any and all detractors, 
but the current editorial has now acknowledged what has been evident for 
several years.

The coming transition is an opportunity to learn from previous mistakes. Texas 
cavers appreciate good grammar, proper spelling, and nice graphics but, failing 
that, are willing to forgive a lot if the Caver shows signs of having been 
carefully crafted with attention to detail:  nice photographs properly 
captioned and credited; articles well laid out with all elements present; no 
space used as a personal blog; and perhaps most importantly, timely production.

I was handed a copy of the most recent Texas Caver at the TSA meeting Sunday 
morning, October 16.  When I looked at the cover, my first thought was "huh?"   
I rotated the page through 360 degrees as I searched in vain for a person or 
anything for scale.  Despairing, I then looked inside for the caption 
information.  I didn't find much.  The picture credits Peter Bosted and 
apparently depicts a scene from the Big Island, Hawaii.  I infer that it 
pictures something within a cave and is not merely a hand sample from a flea 
market or mineral show.  As usual, there is no proper caption information.  A 
closer look at the cover reveals "haul" to be misspelled and a Government 
Canyon report proffered as being from "2105."  Those errors are egregious and, 
sadly, are but a preview of others to come.

In the present issue (the word "current" can't properly be applied since it is 
about six months late),  pages 4 and 5 are mostly filled with pictures—none 
with caption information—and the top photo on page 4 suffers from a lack of 
pixel information by at least one order of magnitude.  Where is the graphic 
arts expertise we are often reminded of?  If a photo is essential and a small 
file is the  best available, then please reduce the printed size.  At the top 
of page 5 there is a full half page devoted to two guys stirring a large pot of 
food. What about the "hero" shot at the top of page 6?  Neither photo is 
captioned or credited.  It's a poor use of space that TSA's  hard copy 
subscribers are paying for.  In fact, there is a lot of "white space" in every 
issue.  I am reminded of some prior issues with long personal "blogs" that 
should never have appeared in the Caver.  Furthermore, we are subjected to the 
new English word, "givin."   Page 8  treats us to another low resolution photo 
with no credit or caption.  Page 9 credits the photographer  but tells us 
nothing else.  More of the same on pages 10-11.  Sadly, this trend continues 
throughout the remainder of the issue with a few other photos offering no 
information whatsoever.  This has been a problem for many years.  The Editor 
seems unable to grasp the notion that a picture without caption information 
looses a major portion of its potential value.  On pages 13-17 there is a 
change from two columns to three; then a change back to two columns for pages 
18-22.  Page 23 reverts to three columns once again.  Oh, well.  I wonder where 
the back cover photo was made.  Is it a continuation of the "Forged in Fire" 
photos from the previous two pages?  Who authored the few words of text that 
accompany the photos?  "I had the good fortune. . . .  We spent a day. . . ."

It's discouraging to think that this is the best that Texas cavers can manage,

The Texas Caver has a long tradition of service to the Texas caving community.  
It is the face that The Texas Speleological Association and Texas cavers show 
to the world.  Prior to the advent of the Internet and all that it entails, 
both good and bad, the Caver was the primary means of communication within the 
Texas caving community.  Its appearance on a timely schedule was critically 
important.  When the Caver faltered, so did Texas caving.  See pages 169-172 of 
50 Years of Texas Caving for a more detailed story of the Texas Caver.

Some feel that Facebook and other social media are an effective substitute for 
the Texas Caver.
I disagree.  Most of those postings will disappear quickly and do not 
constitute an archive of events in Texas caving.  Moreover, they are not worthy 
venues for the occasional quality feature about some aspect of Texas caving.

The Texas Caver is inextricably linked to the health of the TSA and to Texas 
caving in general.  TSA members receive precious little for their membership 
dues:  No membership list.  No copy of the Constitution and By-Laws.  No 
mission statement.  No contact list of current officers and chairpersons.  No 
special prices at TSA functions.  Not even a membership card.  Members pay dues 
and are promised a digital newsletter and offered the opportunity to pay extra 
for a hard copy newsletter.  Why would you choose to join such an organization? 
 Will TSA issue a refund or offer a membership extension to those who paid for 
printed newsletters?  I was a TSA member for more than fifty years but finally 
dropped out in disgust a couple of years ago.

In some ways the fate of the Caver is a self-fulfilling story.  The enthusiasm 
of the general Texas caver populace is tied to the quality and timeliness of 
the publication.  It only takes a few instances of mishandled submissions and 
delayed publication to discourage contributors from further support.  The Caver 
should be the natural outlet and archive for articles of substance much as the 
NSS News is an outlet and archive for items of a more national nature.

The Texas Caver HAS BEEN such a publication in the past.  And when it was, 
Texas caving prospered.  For example, I invite you to peruse the February 1971 
issue of the Texas Caver (available from the Texas Speleological Survey or from 
the archives of  http://nckri.org/ ).  It's 20 pages, produced with a 
typewriter and all that entails.  There is news from the A&I, Alamo, 
Dallas-Fort Worth, and Rice grottos plus an astonishing 17 (seventeen!) trip 
reports.  There are other worthwhile features such as Caver of the Month that 
should be resurrected.

Those were the days!

Carl Kunath
NSS #6230 RF-PH

________________________________
[Avast logo]<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>


_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com<http://texascavers.com/>
Texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:Texascavers@texascavers.com> | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com<http://texascavers.com/>
Texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:Texascavers@texascavers.com> | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com<mailto:Texascavers@texascavers.com> | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

************************
Katherine Arens Office Phone: (512) 232-6363
ar...@austin.utexas.edu<mailto:ar...@austin.utexas.edu> Dept. Phone:  (512) 
471-4123
Dept. of Germanic Studies FAX (512) 471-4025
2505 University Ave, C3300  Bldg.Location:  Burdine 336
University of Texas at Austin Office:  Burdine 320
Austin, TX  78712-1802

                      -.                         .-
                 _..-'(                        )`-.._
             ./'. '||\\.        (\_/)         .//||` .`\.
          ./'.|'.'||||\\|..    )O O(    ..|//||||`.`|.`\.
        ./'..|'.|| |||||\`````` '`" '` ''''''/||||| ||.`|..`\.
      ./'.||'.|||| ||||||||||||.      . |||||||||||| ||||.`||.`\.
     /'|||'.|||||| ||||||||||||{       }|||||||||||| ||||||.`|||`\
    '.|||'.||||||| ||||||||||||{       }|||||||||||| |||||||.`|||.`
    '.||| ||||||||| |/'   ``\||``     ''||/''   `\| ||||||||| |||.`
     |/' \./'     `\./        \!|\   /|!/        \./'     `\./ `\|
    V  V        V        }' `\ /' `{        V       V    V








_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

Reply via email to