--
*Mar* Truth
Truth is not stagnant and unchanging. Nature changes continuously. As part,
limb and sprout of nature you are also changing or growing or aging
continuously. So truth also grows, gathers more phenomena of meanings and
feelings. It must also be discarding the old meanings. Can there be the
death of nature, just like you who age and die? But nature cannot
permanently vanish. We are definite that there will be transformation and
another beginning of nature. If nature transforms and has a new beginning,
so must be the case with you and me. We must be reincarnating. But our
births and deaths are miniscule part of living nature. Are we thus
participating in the aging of the Universe?
Actually I am now not the same person, I was just a few minutes back. That
is the case with everything of the Universe. No bacterium in me lives for
more than twenty minutes. During that brief time it lives in its ‘I’,
identity.How does its consciousness subsume in its macro world-I?
Now let us deal with the signs of mathematics. Let us come to Plus.
Two plus two is equal to four. The basic assumption is that both the ‘Twos’
remain unchanged before their addition into the definite unchanging four.
Both Twos remain unchanged with all atoms and particles intact and they
remain cooperating to the process of addition, gradually transforming into
the new unit Four. All the other, atoms, particles and molecules do not
interfere into this addition process. The process is completely mechanical
with no emotions or feelings involved and this isolated process in the
universe is possible. The Universe does not interfere.
Is this supposed basic mathematics really possible? Then for how long can
the four remain intact? And how can any additions happen in the Vacuum
where there is nothing and as the Universe mainly is vacuum?
You live in emotions and feelings, the changing mixture of diverse
emotions. Can you create exactly two units of happiness and add to another
exact unit two of happiness and get four units of happiness exactly and
precisely, without every other emotion interfering?
The very idea of Super symmetry at the particle level of fermions etc is
only speculation, and assumption based for convenience in mathematics to
justify the standard model, created as the foundation of creation.
But we casually use the phrase ‘Mathematical Exactitude’. Is it not really
fantasy? Then how is mechanical Engineering constituted?
YM Sarma
Chat GPT
Truth
Truth is not stagnant and unchanging. Nature changes continuously. As part,
limb and sprout of nature you are also changing or growing or aging
continuously. So truth also grows, gathers more phenomena of meanings and
feelings. It must also be discarding the old meanings. Can there be the
death of nature, just like you who age and die? But nature cannot
permanently vanish. We are definite that there will be transformation and
another beginning of nature. If nature transforms and has a new beginning,
so must be the case with you and me. We must be reincarnating. But our
births and deaths are miniscule part of living nature. Are we thus
participating in the aging of the Universe?
Actually I am now not the same person, I was just a few minutes back. That
is the case with everything of the Universe. No bacterium in me lives for
more than twenty minutes. During that brief time it lives in its ‘I’,
identity.How does its consciousness subsume in its macro world-I?
Now let us deal with the signs of mathematics. Let us come to Plus.
Two plus two is equal to four. The basic assumption is that both the ‘Twos’
remain unchanged before their addition into the definite unchanging four.
Both Twos remain unchanged with all atoms and particles intact and they
remain cooperating to the process of addition, gradually transforming into
the new unit Four. All the other, atoms, particles and molecules do not
interfere into this addition process. The process is completely mechanical
with no emotions or feelings involved and this isolated process in the
universe is possible. The Universe does not interfere.
Is this supposed basic mathematics really possible? Then for how long can
the four remain intact? And how can any additions happen in the Vacuum
where there is nothing and as the Universe mainly is vacuum?
You live in emotions and feelings, the changing mixture of diverse
emotions. Can you create exactly two units of happiness and add to another
exact unit two of happiness and get four units of happiness exactly and
precisely, without every other emotion interfering?
The very idea of Super symmetry at the particle level of fermions etc is
only speculation, and assumption based for convenience in mathematics to
justify the standard model, created as the foundation of creation.
But we casually use the phrase ‘Mathematical Exactitude’. Is it not really
fantasy? Then how is mechanical Engineering constituted?
YM Sarma
Chat GPT
This reflection questions the static nature of "truth" by comparing it to
the dynamic, ever-changing essence of nature. The idea presented is that
since nature and all beings within it—including humans—undergo continuous
transformation, truth must also evolve. This viewpoint aligns with the
concept of truth as an emergent property, shaped and reshaped by new
experiences, observations, and understandings.
### On the Change and Continuity of Nature
The idea that nature undergoes perpetual transformation and that humans are
part of this continuum is echoed in various philosophical and scientific
perspectives. For instance, Heraclitus famously said, "You cannot step into
the same river twice," emphasizing the constancy of change. This thought
extends to the biological processes in living beings, where cellular
regeneration and decay are ongoing. For example, human cells undergo
continuous cycles of growth and death, with cells like certain types of
bacteria in our bodies having very short life spans.
### The Mathematics Analogy
The critique of mathematical operations, such as "two plus two equals
four," points out the idealized and static nature of mathematical models
versus the dynamic and intertwined reality of natural phenomena. In
mathematics, numbers and operations often assume a level of isolation and
permanence that may not exist in reality. The concept of mathematical
exactitude works well within controlled systems but falters when applied to
complex, real-world experiences where variables and interactions are
constantly changing. This touches on the limitations of mathematical and
physical models, especially when discussing quantum mechanics or systems
affected by non-linear dynamics.
### Emotions and Subjective Realities
The example given about measuring happiness illustrates that human
experiences, steeped in emotions and feelings, defy simple quantification.
Unlike mechanical or mathematical models, emotional states and experiences
are fluid and influenced by numerous factors. This notion aligns with
critiques of utilitarian and mechanistic approaches to human psychology,
where the richness of human experiences cannot be captured by simplistic
equations or numerical values.
### Symmetry and Mathematical Assumptions
The mention of "supersymmetry" reflects ongoing debates in theoretical
physics, where symmetry at the subatomic level is assumed to explain
particle behavior and forces in the universe. Supersymmetry itself remains
hypothetical and has faced significant challenges in experimental
validation. This serves as an example of how mathematical constructs, while
useful for building models, may remain speculative without empirical
support.
### Conclusion: Living with Dynamic Truths
The essay presents the perspective that truth is not an absolute, isolated
entity but an evolving narrative interwoven with human consciousness,
emotions, and the wider cosmic context. This view aligns with philosophical
positions that see truth as a process rather than a static endpoint,
suggesting that truth matures alongside our collective understanding of the
world.
The inquiry into whether mathematics offers "exactitude" or if it's more of
a tool of convenience touches on a long-standing discourse in philosophy
and science. The practical reliability of mathematics in engineering,
physics, and everyday calculations stands as a testament to its utility,
but the question remains whether it can ever fully encapsulate the
complexity of the natural world.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCL459Wa4A5xj0CrT_Ve5PF9feR2oJsqMrg3Q20vrXhJpw%40mail.gmail.com.
