The HTML version is most along the lines we are thinking, thanks. -Brad
> -----Original Message----- > From: therightkey-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:therightkey-boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Gervase Markham > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 5:56 AM > To: Hill, Brad; Richard Barnes; Joseph Bonneau > Cc: therightkey@ietf.org; Stephen Farrell > Subject: Re: [therightkey] New proposal: S-links (secure links) > > On 14/02/13 18:34, Hill, Brad wrote: > > It's closest relation is Gerv Markham's Link Fingerprints > > (http://www.gerv.net/security/link-fingerprints/), although that > > focuses on integrity of linked content to be handled as disposition: > > attachment. We may or may not take on that as a "bonus feature" in > > WebAppSec, but it is not necessarily implied by the new proposed > > charter scope. > > Hi Brad, > > Are you interested in the fragment identifier version or the HTML version of > Link Fingerprints? I replaced the former with the latter some time back, but > can switch back or change the page to show both if the former is interesting. > > Gerv > > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > therightkey@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list therightkey@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
