Quoting Wookey <wookey at aleph1.co.uk>: > A scale taken from the overall map (properly scaled with stations) is > that it is much more likely to be correct, and a typical avergae (not > a value from the ends of the bell curve, which you might get using a > random x-sect to scale all the others). So this seems to me to be much > better (as well as much quicker).
But if you scaprs drawn in different scales? And what about rotation? I think it is difficult. > Could you get confused as to which marker is which and > thusaccidentally reverse the x-sect? If so them either make them diff > shapes or colours, or put them slightly to corners. This is, why I wanted to have there an arrow - it will point from first to second marker. > for 'next two clicks place scale markers' would be best - but maybe > that is not easy to code? No idea, I need to have a look. May be adding another "RED" mode is feasible. > We have a general (and very difficult) problem of what to do about > labels and sections in the presence of over/under lying passages. I am > not yet sure what the answers are but there is definately much room > for improvement. Agree. S.
