Mark S. wrote: > > > Some problems are intractable -- they have no solution. This is true of TW > in it's current > formulation. Call it Godel's Rule of TiddlyWiki: > > *Any information system based on browser technology will never have > just one way of saving.* > > Since we can't solve problem #2 without limiting users' choices (e.g. "Use > TiddlyDesktop Only") we > should fix the problem that we can solve: The published name of the > Product. >
I'd say "limited" is not bad. It depends on purpose whether a limit is a blessing or a curse. Tiddly Desktop is very good as a potential wrapper for DT situations. My ONE problem with it is it *does not currently support relative addressing* of wiki. The consequence of that is I can't wrap Dickens' novels into one installable that will install reliably. If it could you'd have a neat self-saving DT solution for common needs delivery that resembles a normal app. The issue here is whether end users FOR PURPOSE need exposure to the disorientating complexities IF a PACKAGED app delivers? TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a06c7c71-dfc1-4121-8935-073b21ff8ecc%40googlegroups.com.
