Fully agree. Good points & examples.

On Thursday, 11 June 2020 21:06:14 UTC+2, springer wrote:
>
> Just one more variable here, in terms of whether and when to individuate 
> TW instances: AUDIENCE
>
> Many of my TW projects are already -- or may eventually be -- shared with 
> a particular kind of audience (often students in a course, but not always). 
> I have one catch-all wiki for all the personal project content that doesn't 
> fit any of those baskets, and another for TW-related experimentation 
> (plugins under evaluation, useful tidbits and how-tos, plus resources and 
> links squirreled away for future exploration). 
>
> For any audience other than myself, when the point is the content rather 
> than the tool itself, I like to share a wiki that doesn't include too many 
> unrelated tiddlers. (And often even the interface style wants to be 
> different, and I do enjoy having different interface flavors as I shift 
> from one domain to another on a given day.)
>
> Of course, one might prefer to keep everything together, knowing it's 
> possible to export a filtered set of tiddlers down the road. But when I 
> already suspect that a body of ideas may be prime for sharing later, I 
> start by setting up a tiddlyspot site for it (with an encryption password 
> if need be). Then I can share a link to the site in a totally spontaneous 
> way when I run into someone who would appreciate it.
>
> -Springer
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/10b19acd-1eb4-4910-9276-1f07fd02f6b7o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to