Not arrogant at all! I'm learning :) I understand TW isn't an entity on itself - I was just trying to simplify things.
Though I agree it makes sense to take one step back then, and perhaps ask: Does the TW community have some sort of formal shared high-level roadmap? (Of course, I'd imagine this existing *in parallel* to all the existing organic individual efforts, as these are extremely valuable) On Sunday, June 21, 2020 at 4:57:09 PM UTC+1, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > OGNSYA wrote: >> >> Breaking that up into two simpler questions: >> > > >> *1. What are the things TW is trying to achieve?* >> > > I doubt a TW can think! :-) > > Beware of wrapping complex issues in simple imperatives! > There is NO TW trying to do anything. Only many variant users with uses. > > Actually I think opening up WHAT you imply in that sentence is a start of > a research project. > IMO you not seeing that clearly enough! > > My arrogant 2 cents. > > Best wishes > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b49dc3cd-aecf-494c-b8c5-b7904a238848o%40googlegroups.com.
