Sounds fine to me. The zero-padded format is probably the common case for the day of year. "yDDD" would be the more shape-similar and mnemonic, but it's already in the proposals and maybe it breaks away from existing patterns. The main thing is that the ISO date parts are represented and available.
On Tuesday, 14 September 2021 at 18:03:39 UTC+2 jeremy wrote: > OK, I'm thinking now: > > * To change the token for week number to `dd` > * To add a new token for day of year `dddd` and `0dddd` > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 12:34:53 PM UTC+1 PMario wrote: > >> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 10:19:10 AM UTC+2 Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> If we stick with `dddd` for day of week, perhaps we'd use `ddddd` for day >>> of year? >> >> >> They are very similar. For me it's difficult to recognise a difference. >> ... >> >> >>> Perhaps that's excessively long, but it does seem like a very unusual >>> requirement in any case; only users who were looking for it would want it, >>> if you see what I mean. >> >> >> You are right. Only users that search for it will use it. >> >> >>> > I think 0dd and dd should be an option. I think 0dd is needed to get >>> easy default sort order. >>> >>> The day of week is a number from 1 to 7, so zero padding doesn't seem >>> useful. >>> >> >> Right. My bad. >> >> But ddddd day of year may have 1 or 2 leading zeros. ... >> >> -m >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f4b9a68f-6d17-4329-8b0b-b29fbad190edn%40googlegroups.com.
