I searched this forum and found the upgrade post, and the handy tool! That worked. And now I can use your code. Thanks!
On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 5:33:30 PM UTC-4 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote: > Oh poop, TW versions. I am not up and up on the differences between > versions, but I'm guessing that "filter" operand is the culprit. > > You might want to consider upgrading your TiddlyWiki to the latest version > (keeping a backup of your older version, of course.) > > Well worth it, I think, to get to the newest version. Me thinks a good > number of folk really burned the midnight oil to create the latest. > > All of that said, if you must stay with 5.1.21 for any reason, drop a note > as such here. I'm sure some enterprising person can come up with a right > sweet alternative. > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 6:08:29 PM UTC-3 David wrote: > >> cj, >> >> Thanks so much for piddling with it. >> >> The reason I didn't include import type code was that I thought I was >> missing asimple filter operator or something like that. >> >> Second, I think thi sis a really cool thing. I'd love to explore using >> json as my datasource more. many more options than just the simple >> dictionary list. >> >> Third, the code you provided did not work in my own TW, but like you >> instructed, it worked on tw.com properly. Does your code use any new >> features? My version is *5.1.21* and I've never had to update it before. >> >> Thanks so much! >> >> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:29:32 PM UTC-4 cj.v...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Man, it would have saved me a whole bunch of time if you had provided >>> tiddlers for this so folk don't have to build everything from scratch. >>> >>> Regardless, that was a fun exercise !!! >>> >>> Coding fun attached. Download and drag into TiddlyWiki.com for import >>> and your analysis. (One "Road Eats" tiddler with the data, one "Test >>> Thingy" tiddler with the filtering code.) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:51:37 PM UTC-3 David wrote: >>> >>>> I have a simple data tiddler which is my data source for a tiddler that >>>> displays it as checkboxes and all that is working as it should. >>>> >>>> >>>> The display tiddler probably uses code I got off the TW site, I'm >>>> sure.... >>>> >>>> <$tiddler tiddler="Road Eats"> >>>> <$list filter="[all[current]indexes[]sort[]]" variable=item> >>>> <$checkbox index=<<item>> checked="1" unchecked="0"/> <<item>><br/> >>>> </$list> >>>> </$tiddler> >>>> >>>> And then that data tiddler is simple, like so.... >>>> >>>> Hardee's: 0 >>>> Waffle House: 0 >>>> Captain D's: 0 >>>> Jack in the Box: 0 >>>> >>>> What I'm interested in doing is putting another list of checkboxes >>>> above the existing one. The top/new one should just show those that are >>>> checked (i.e. has a value of 1 in the data tiddler. >>>> >>>> I imagine that the same code would be used, but just with an extra >>>> param in the filter attribute, right? I searched through the filter >>>> operators, but couldn't find it. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/03f26ca9-c983-4c20-bac0-092c0ec9611an%40googlegroups.com.
