On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jeremy Ruston <jeremy.rus...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > To be more explicit about the next step, the idea is to introduce an > explicit syntax for both tiddler and external pretty links: > > [tiddler[HelloThere]] > [file[index.html]] > > Then, if the `tiddler` or `file` is omitted the parser will use similar > heuristics to TW classic to determine whether to generate an <a> element or > a <$link> widget. > > Thanks, Jeremy. The ambiguity between tiddler links and external links is the accurate description of the issue I raised and the solution is exactly what I had in mind. I love TW for its flexibility. Even as-is, it's super-easy to tweak the Javascript to add whatever protocol. I also love the idea that in TW5 all the guts are accessible through the .js tiddlers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
