Hi On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 9:38:22 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi Matabele > > Automatic linking to missing tiddlers is a pretty useful core wiki feature. >> > Why so? If I wish to create a 'missing link' for automatic tiddler creation, I can easily surround the 'missing link' with double brackets in a deliberate manner -- this only applies to CamelCase 'missing links' in any case.
> There would be a performance penalty for making it configurable. >> > Perhaps automatic linking to missing tiddlers should be suppressed by default. > A wrinkle is that we actually do automatic link detection at parse time >> (rather than render time). Because we cache the results of parsing a >> tiddler the parsing process mustn't depend on the values of any other >> tiddlers. So there'd have to be some rejigging to get things working >> properly. >> > Might be worthwhile -- I am accustomed to the idea of automatic linking (as in Tomboy) -- indeed, it would be useful if automatic linking were extended from CamelCase strings to any string matching an existing tiddler title. In summary: 1. I am of the opinion that the suppression of automatic linking of CamelCase forms in piecemeal fashion is more troublesome than having to deliberately mark 'missing links' 2. Automatic linking of strings matching existing tiddler titles is useful and should perhaps be extended to non CamelCase strings regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
