On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 11:53:46 AM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > > Defining a proper license for your content eg: a Creative Commons [4] >> license, isn't a burden. >> It's the only way to create a fair contract between you and your users. > > > Call me naive, but I don't need that and I don't think I have to. >
You don't have to define anything, but then it is undefined and your users don't know what you want. ... It doesn't matter what I or you think is right. We are no lawyers. The local law is right, until we change it. There are some countries, where you have problems, to make something "public domain" [1]. And it's not the small ones. So I don't want to limit anything. With the proper license I can free it. A proper human readable and understandable license [2] has 5-10 lines and it tells you everything. ... UNDEFINED is the problem! -mario [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Granting_work_into_the_public_domain [2] http://creativecommons.org/choose/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
