At the risk of creating a digression that is tangential at best ... It's always interesting to see peoples views on Permissions & Privacy since they vary in so many radical ways and always lead to controversial interpretations. For example, Western societies generally recognize Name + (residential) Address = Identity. However, Names (especially First and Last name segments) are freely available. Similarly, (municipal) Addresses are legally considered to be "owned by" the City that assigns them, but are "in the Public domain by virtue of the fact that they are freely available and must be accessible. That being said, it seems to be the combination of Name + Address ( = Identity ) that evokes Privacy concerns.
Amusingly though, tests have shown that no one seems concerned about Privacy when Name + (residential) latitude & longitude are associated. This strikes me as strange given the ubiquitous availability of GPS data and its current resolutions. I guess the expectations of Privacy rights and the need for Permissions to associate data elements, in this day and age of "Big Data", are still quite controversial. "Very interesting" (said in my best German accent, whilst (vainly) hiding behind a potted fern ( as first seen in "Laugh In" ). On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 11:14:52 AM UTC-4, David Gifford wrote: > > Are you linking to a TW that has other people's home addresses? Do you > have their permission to do that? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9176c6fa-7dd2-45ce-8f28-5d2ea6ccd711%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
