Excellent. Regards Jon
On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:10:16 UTC, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > It’s a shame to see this thread go a little off the rails as this is an > important and interesting discussion — which may be why it has aroused such > passions. That passion is itself an important component of the TiddlyWiki > community: for many of us, using and working on TiddlyWiki is deeply > intertwined with our lives, and so it’s natural to have strongly held > opinions about it. > > Nonetheless, we all have to pay attention to how we behave in order to > keep things civil and fun. That means that we criticise ideas, not people; > that we start with the assumption that everyone is participating in good > faith, and we understand that the ambiguities and exigencies of online > communication can have inadvertent side effects. > > We should never lose sight of what we have in common. This community is a > living example of how an incredibly diverse group of people can come > together and help one another. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > > > On 15 Mar 2017, at 00:48, Ákos Szederjei <ak...@szederjei.eu > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > Dear Eric! > > > > Who said YOU are not being able to resolve it, or YOU do not want too, > because > > other feature are deemed more important? Really... > > The world is not revolving around you. This list is about TW and not > about > > your capabilities. What you do or want I could care less. It is not that > you > > will resolve the issue of the plug in on your own. If you are the sole > > developer of this issue I profoundly apologise. > > > > Talking about making stuff up? You claimed that the 4 step solution of > yours > > is the same as if the plug in is used. Really? I just closed a Tiddly in > old > > FF and it auto saved. The same, sure, and my microwaves make video > > recordings... > > > > Fortunately, I am not really dependent on the offline functionality for > my wiki. > > Your argumentation (or the lack of it) convinced me to switch now to > another > > wiki and not wait for a solution for TW' saving problem. > > > > Good luck with your endeavour! > > > > Ákos > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mittwoch, 15. März 2017 00:56:53 CET Eric Shulman wrote: > >> On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:35:46 PM UTC-7, Ákos Szederjei wrote: > >>> I understand the technical difficulties, and it is ok not being able > to > >>> resolve > >> > >> it, or even not wanting too, because other feature are deemed more > >> > >>> important. > >> > >> It's ok to disagree with what I wrote... but... > >> > >> I never said ANYTHING about "not wanting to" or "deemed more important" > >> > >> DO NOT PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH!!! > >> > >> Just because you don't agree with my explanation does not mean you get > to > >> MAKE STUFF UP about what I said. > >> > >> YOU ARE NOT DONALD TRUMP! > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com > <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2546852.q7A4t5DQJh%40michael-pc. > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d01f8d9e-4b7e-4845-b500-40440f114778%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
