yes. going to NoteSelf, choosing "export all" from the tools menu (saves a file called tiddlers.json to my downloads folder) and then loading the json file into a blank empty.html worked exactly as expected. But this did not export/import the plugins I've added to noteself. So, from my perspective, this is still only a partial success.
But at least it does provide a migration path away from (or to) Noteself. On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:59:15 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Lost Admin > > Does it export JSON? I mean* is its JSON export of all CONTENT YOU > CREATED importable into a vanilla TW*? That would be a minimalist test on > portability. > > The rest may be messing it up as some of its code is likely for the > gubbins and not compatible with stand alone? > > Best wishes > Josiah > > On Monday, 10 July 2017 16:50:21 UTC+2, Lost Admin wrote: >> >> Hmm, I haven't tried yet. Let me find out ... >> >> The answer is both yes and no. >> >> Yes, it appears all of my modifications were saved when I used the >> traditional TiddlyWiki save button (to trigger download) and looked into >> the file directly (text editor). >> >> But when I then tried to load the saved file into a browser I got a RSOE >> (tried both IE 11 and Chrome on Windows). So, in the sense of having >> something that just works, it failed. >> >> If I had the time and skill, I might try to look deeper into NoteSelf >> with the goal of making a CouchDB saver plugin. >> >> There also appears to be a bug in that NoteSelf either blocks or prevents >> the encryption built into TiddlyWiki from working. >> >> On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 10:34:15 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> Ciao Lost Admin >>> >>> I do think the PouchDB / CouchDB approach is interesting. MOST >>> INTERESTING about it is its seeming *universality across most platforms >>> as far as I can see*. Because its saving to database its fragmenting >>> the one-file model. And the one-file model is central to TW. And I hope it >>> stays so. So long as one can EXPORT a one file from a Pouched TW it will >>> instantiate its origins. Can it do that? >>> >> >>> Josiah >>> >>> Lost Admin wrote: >>>> >>>> I hate to say this, but I think the "real solution" is go give-in to >>>> the current trend of pushing eveything to a "web application" and run it >>>> from a server in "the cloud". >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/51f66cdc-f234-456a-8cc6-b1aaa721ff7f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
