On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 8:29:13 PM UTC-4, Mark S. wrote: > > ... My main objection to NS is that I have no more reason to trust > cloudant than I do evernote. Less actually, since EN is aimed at individual > persons whereas IBM is kind of aimed at big companies and projects. Also, > cloudant seems experimental -- something that might disappear without > warning and that is already morphing in front of our eyes. But EN doesn't > encrypt (they have a kind of clunky encryption tool for sections of text). > So if NS could encrypt, that would be a real advantage. > > Mark >
Cloudant was a dot-com built to provide CouchDB as a server (PaaS/IaaS). It was so successful that IBM bought it. We are seeing the result of that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fc94e09e-761c-4eb1-a46f-ed87c854df99%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
