I totally agree. AND disagree. BEFORE tiddlywiki.com how about PINNING here? The problem with talking about tiddlywiki.com is its one step too far away from anyone but @Jermolene doing anything. Like its "over there that it gets done" (by who?).
The issue, at root is about MAKING A DECISION amongst those who would do it THEN LOBBY @Jermolene to get it moved on. IMO, I think PINNED threads here in GG could be a way to develop such material in an incremental manageable fashion. Best wishes Josiah On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 22:22:46 UTC+2, ste...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 1:47:21 PM UTC+2, Mat wrote: >> >> >> I can see an argument for adding more FAQ type docs to tiddlywiki.com. >> That is the minimalist way, ie a <<link-list "Basics">> or similar. >> >> I don't know how often this has been discussed already, but > tiddlywiki.com could also use more examples (e. g. for the usage of > macros, widgets, filters etc.) Examples are often the easiest way to > understand new concepts. Many Linux man pages suffer from the same problem, > by the way. > > Cheers, > > Stef > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/51cfbc8c-8596-419b-a88c-c2ce00f69818%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
