In my humble opinion, to get what TT wants, what this group needs is proper forums instead of Google's attempt to replace nntp. We also probably need a wiki that can be edited by mutliple people.
Forums would allow categorization of discussions easier. A wiki with multiple editors would allow different people to manage different aspects of documentation such as end-user guides, developer guides, dedicated guides to each of the 20 or so savers, etc. But to do the above would require funding for hosting. On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 9:25:09 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Jeremy > > Thanks for the reply. > > I was being more prodding than helpful. > > FRANKLY, though *GG is looking worse and worse over time*. > > Our major problem is it CANNOT cope with the sheer complexity of TW as it > evolves. > > Right now is a very good phase in TW's history to know that, to see that > clearly. > > I think our GG approach is seriously BLUNTING (a) its use; (b) > understanding of it. > > The Sixteen Plus ways of saving TW -- well you are NOT gonna be able to > find all those on Google. Yeah TW .com gives access but TO a disorganised > mess. > > Can't we do better? > > Best wishes > Josiah > > Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> WhatsApp is good for chat but it’s ephemeral: it doesn’t off permalinks >> or searchability. It might have a role alongside this group, but as a >> replacement I think it's a non-starter. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/774e79b2-c20c-4f07-b220-8ce299e02747%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
