Cari tutti, & yeah Alex & Birthe. I am sure you are right that the serendipitous freedom in GG, combined with the nice people here, is a major factor in inertia to keep it. And a good one.
AlexHough wrote: > I think we need to be careful about making changes, the unintended > consequence of using google groups is that we get interactions which a more > streamlined system would design out. Birthe C wrote: > Exactly! > On the OTHER hand here is a *swamp of Lost History*. I'm forever trying to find things to reference in order to reply to people ... often I give up and don't reply. I CAN'T FIND STUFF that's anything more than a few days old. Replies like "Mat did that about three months ago" without a link are about as useful as a head without the chicken. You got nothing to cook. If that is tough for me its a total turn-off for a newbie. IF there were a PARALLEL GG that a full-time archivist were tagging/logging it would really help. What Riz has done on Reddit is part-way there, but too much for one person to pull off fully. I did think in a mad way that a Twitter feed might be able to do the MINIMAL missing piece sustainably. Its still in my mind. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/404983bc-3dd6-43dd-a3c5-c9ab47afe91d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
