Mario said: > we would make commonmark [1] markdown [2] a 100% subset [3] of the TiddlyWiki > syntax?
I’d be very interested if that were possible. It would potentially allow us to dispense with the current Markdown parser, which has significantly limited capabilities compared to native wikitext. I also agree with Josiah’s point that a worthy longer term goal is to make TiddlyWiki a meta-markup system that allows end users to create their own markup parse rules. However, the complexity of the CommonMark specification suggests to me that it wouldn’t be possible to create a practical parser entirely declaratively. In other words, I think the complexities of arbitrary markup may well require arbitrary computational capabilities to parse. But, of course, even if we couldn’t create a 100% spec compliant CommonMark parser declaratively, it would still be a very useful thing to have. Best wishes Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3A1A7456-414E-4031-8460-5D0BF4BD4DDA%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
