On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 12:34:27 PM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Rather than CommonMark wouldn't Github Flavoured Markdown (GFM) be a > better aim? Its ... >
Nope. ... markdown is standardized now. (since ~ March 2016) ... https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7763 Variants spec: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7764#page-10 - GFM is one of several variants - CommonMark is an other variant ... > > 1. compliant with CommonMark; > > that's ok, but It's different > > 1. adds tables and other things Markdown does not do; > > TW has tables that imo are more powerful > > 1. better services existing TW users who also use GitHub. > > IMO no problem, we can have several variants. eg: markdown-it library supports many variants already. We just need to switch the mime type and we can deal with them. ... I do have a finished plugin. ... I just have to prepare the edition. ... BUT ... I want to get rid of external libraries, most of the time, they don't integrate well with TWs possibilities. have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/104fa390-1234-445c-bb62-c11aecec72a8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
