TonyM wrote: > > If people add to there workflow it is quite easy to create and modify > tiddlers under different names, >
Hm. The idea of having to change user name and constantly keeping in mind that my TW might(!) eventually be presented to others.... then I suspect people would just rather not bother to present their private wikis to others. That said, your idea has similarity to something I made for my (now frozen) blog TWaddle <http://twaddle.tiddlyspot.com>. I modified the saver so that it saved to two places; one saved the editor version to tiddlyspot where it was hosted but it also triggered a download of a public version with only certain tiddlers filtered, which I then uploaded to the public TWaddle. (Unfurtunately I couldn't get it to directly load to two tiddlywikis simultaneously, which is also why my blogging halted. Too much hassle just to add an article!). The filtering was based on some field value set in public tiddlers, kind of like what you propose. Still, if an unfinished article should slip through that would not be a biggie - it's just a silly blog. In contrast, the wikis I think would be most interesting to see the structure of are peoples "everyday wikis"... presumably with sometimes sensitive info (medical matters, private thoughts about other people, ... whatever) - these had better be cleared without risk for mistakes before anyone would mind sharing the TW. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/37a7de01-479a-49b0-bd4c-489b2af11344%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
