The thing with redundant copies is, wouldn't the user have to use the back key? Or a "return" link? And how would you hide those redundant copies?
-- Mark On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 9:58:47 AM UTC-7, Mat wrote: > > Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> [...] pre-generate static HTML representations of every combination of >> sorting for the table, and then construct links between them. So, if the >> initial rendering is ordered by first name, and the user clicks on the >> column for the second name, they would actually be navigating to a >> different rendering of the data sorted by second name. >> > > Redundant copies, covering every output case? Now that idea was unexpected. > > Might CSS ordering be an option? > https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_order.asp > > <:-) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fae86f7f-05de-4bc3-a5e8-4880af7d5746%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
