Ciao Mat @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > I think performance is likely to be good. >> > Mat repled ...
> Well, the "performance" is to a great extent a result of the wiki ... > Yes but. The assemblage of the sidebar is significant. Its not just size, its complexity for render. Reducing all "cruft" I think will improve performance? And, why have it when you don't need it? I also find this concept very appealing... even if I must admit I'm not > quite sure what I'd *do* with them ;-) > I think TonyM, or at least I, was pointing to Use Cases where the content of the TW could contain disparate items AND gets focused on ONE at a time, un-menued. An example could be a Newsletter. You only want the latest to show, or one where a topic is directly addresses a raised issue. Listing them all would more be a service for archivists than end-users, if you get what I mean? In short, many Use Cases, I think benefit from minimal delivery of "ALL BUT ONLY" in one Tiddler/"Effective Page". Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b7c0e225-c5ca-43a3-a972-1305d1f8c8a1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
