Hi Jeremy, thanks for the thoughtful replies. Just signed up for a TiddlySpace...I did not know about the project til now.
One last thought on (preferably modeless) WYSIWYG and wiki compatability. I imagine this has already been discussed, but it seems most of the payoff for keeping wiki markup is that people like to write in it, especially for certain tasks such as tiddlers with macros and tiddlers that do other things than store someone's hyperprose. It might simplify design if there were an option to create a wiki markup tiddler or a WYSIWYG tiddler at the outset and just keep them separate. I may be wrong, but I don't think there are many if any cases where someone would need to go from wysiwyg to wiki markup and would not know which type of tiddler to create at the time of creation. Then the (optional) translation can just be a unidirectional wiki==> wysiwyg for people like me who would like to get everything into html and stay there rather than having to create a bidirectional translation. Two markup engines, with a possible one- way, irreversible translation of wiki to WYSIWIG would seem to be an easier problem than fully bidirectional, transparent formatting. Even if bidirectional formatting remained the goal, a unidirectional translation to WYSIWYG with the option to remain in wiki markup of course reserved would be a solid fist step toward doing that, and you could see if it was "good enough." A little inelegant, but might give everyone what they want with less work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
