> No, that wasn't my intention... however I wouldn't mind if Eric's way of
> documenting his plugins (how it's seen at TiddlyTools...) was a standard
> which was followed by all TWDevelopers.

> 1) Plugin,
> 2) PluginInfo,
> 3) Examples of usage - maybe even a
> 4) Usercase vertical, setup for immediate use: like Eric's
> Quickstartdocuments

Yes, I agree people should follow conventions, ("standards" isn't the
right word) and I do provide most of the above if it's a plugin I
anticpate others reusing. I personally don't much like the separate
"PluginInfo" tiddler, and always publish a plugin in a vertical, but
that's a matter of style.

I'd also off two important additions:

5) some tests
6) a link to the plugin source code control

e.g.:

http://whatfettle.com/2008/07/StaticMapPlugin/
http://whatfettle.com/2008/07/TiddlySpaceLinkPlugin/

-- 
Paul (psd)
http://blog.whatfettle.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.

Reply via email to