PMario wrote: > > @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> The more I hear about "macros" in this the worse I feel. >> > > Why? ... It works now, which is a big win. >
Right. More power to you. BUT are we seeing a version of Advanced Yoga (bloke was able to twist his leg behind his head)? My concern is it will confuse adding macros. Let's see. The issue is you will have to find a way to document BOTH major layout change AND the indefinable scope of macros (not all though) elegantly. I'm concerned its getting too complicated. BUT let us see. TT > >> I don't care if the device lets you skip over the moon. I DO care that >> mortals can understand it. OR totally avoid it. >> > > If you don't need it, don't use it. ... The problem was, that the > implementation had a bug, that's why something which should have worked .. > didn't. That was confusing for Tony. > > >> IMO "macro use" within this tool is a *highly advanced *feature. I am >> very UNCLEAR of the added value. >> > > It has the same value as "abstracting" widgets. For some "special" > usecases it will be possible to use wikitext to activate all kind of UIs, > without the need of "alien" widget names. > > I need examples to see the added value!!! >> > > There are a lot of test-xxx tiddlers, where I do test the code and the TOC > contains the beginning of the docs. > > -m > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/c5240ed4-31e6-40d8-a501-60ad69bce3cdo%40googlegroups.com.
