On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 12:00:22 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > To clarify my last point about TWO configs, nasty & irritating as the idea > is :-(... > > I think it very LIKELY that PMario's Custom Markup system will be, > eventually, widely used by AUTEURS (originating author geeks). >
I did have an idea, this morning. .. You know the time, where you are not sleeping anymore, but also not awake. ... I was thinking about a possibility to completely customize _every_ possible widget, that has a visual representation. It really bothered me, that the following fails, if you change the text. \customize degree=☐ _element="$macrocall" $name="xx" \define xx(src) <$checkbox tiddler=<<__src__>> tag=done class="db"> <<__src__>></$checkbox> \end °☐ This is a Test °☐ This is a test 1 Tony wanted the possibility to add more key=value _params. .. And I think it should be possible, in the _params section and calling it. eg: °☐:a This is a Test °☐:b This is a test 1 .... or something similar Where "a" and "b" can be unique identifiers, that makes it possible to change the "This is a test" text, without loosing the state. It will also make it possible to use "system states", without the need for the user to type $:/state/xx, because they only need to type the "xx". > I am NOT convinced that a TW that uses that brilliant system should expose > it to every user. I think it would be a support issue of scale to do so. > You are right, but IMO it is a similar idea as Jeremy proposed at github: Implement wikitext shortcuts as macros <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3883>. have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/e6178c4b-5840-444a-980e-55e1868075fao%40googlegroups.com.
