I personally find IDE's more of a struggle than command line tools. Plus, switching to a new IDE would be a lot more trouble than simply converting and fixing the existing DSP files. Additionally, we'd still have to use Visual C as the underlying compiler. It's not that building TigerVNC from the command line is a bad thing. It just needs to be a straightforward process and require as few additional installs as possible.
We like the build environment on Unix. We're just trying to find the path of least resistance to get a reasonable build environment for the Windows code that doesn't require using a Linux system to build it. On 5/17/10 11:02 AM, Patrick Anderson wrote: > With such fundamental reconsideration of the build tools, I was > wondering what you all thought of http://LLVM.org > > On a related but separable note, we could settle on a cross-platform > IDE such as http://CodeBlocks.org so newbie devs are not struggling > with command-line tools? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
