> Those are some awfully slow clients. I'm still going to vote for Tight > being the best method, however, because your network is also really > slow. Anything except Tight is likely to be fully network-constrained > ...of images they generate.)
Let me recap what I did: I have started leaving the xvnc4viewer but it didn't work at full color. Then I installed the tigerviewer without any new parameter but I got some "artifacts" like white backgrounds with some gray bands. I tried to add -NoJPEG: it solved the artifacts. Then the users started to complain about lost keys ( that is the UI can't catch up with the typing speed ) and slow screen updates. I read that using -NoJPEG could have an impact on performance and guessed that Tight protocol requires faster CPUs so I removed -NoJPEG and tried hextile. > I guess the next question would be: what exactly is your workload, and > how are you measuring performance? This is a typical GDM/xinetd/Vnc configuration used for ERP/Office applications. Once entered in the standard Gnome desktop the main apps are Firefox 5.0, Thunderbird 5.0, Libreoffice 3.3.2 and our ERP which uses an extra light X11 interface. Actually the system performs very well at server side. Every tool I use tells me that it's faster than previous. Could you point me to a tool or a method to measure the vnc speed at client side? Monday I'll be there and I'll do some tests following your suggestions. best regards, LF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users
