On 11/30/11 4:21 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > So just did the same upgrade and found the same performance issue. There is > *definitely* something very wrong with tight encoding in tigervnc. (Worked > great pre-upgrade, post-upgrade was just awful on same > hardware/network/client.) Changing to Hextile yield pre-upgrade user > experience, at least locally. Still need to test remote behavior. > > Much thanks for posting your observations. They were very helpful! > > Lou
That was from a very old thread, and I don't think the observations are valid anymore. We've since completely overhauled the Tight encoder. The original thread was in regards to an observed drop in performance when switching from RealVNC to TigerVNC. In response to the original thread, I conducted my own testing and found that TigerVNC was faster in every way, even on Hextile and other protocols that both solutions support. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users
