Hello Mike, the problem is one of statistics. Not all crystals exhibit this, one may find only about 20% or so of a typical manufacturers OCXO will exhibit these jumps, and with varying intensity. So unless these are directly addressed at the factory (which does not seem to be the case for the Mini-T), then some units may meet spec, while others won't, and there is no way to tell the difference. As far as I know, there is no OCXO vendor that by default tests their product for these jumps during production. I think you may be fighting an uphill battle to try to have the Army change their specs :) We don't understand some of these specs either, but decided to just meet them rather than trying to get them to change their ways. In the process we were able to find and design IP that gives us a slight edge. Due to confidentiality, I can't comment much online on the GPSDO we did for this particular application other than that it is based on our FireFly-II GPSDO; but will contact you offline.
On the EFC drift you had seen in holdover on the Mini-t: there would be no correlation between EFC voltage and jumps without having GPS active, since the crystal will just change frequency without the firmware ever knowing anything about this change. So the EFC voltage would stay constant while in holdover, while the output frequency may vary. But with GPS enabled, the unit would immediately see the phase shift (frequency error), and start correcting for it. This correction is what we can see. The crystal may require a slightly different EFC voltage after the jump to generate 10.0MHz because something physically changed in the crystal (such as a mechanical stress relief, particles leaving/reaching the quartz, etc). This voltage difference can be between 50 microvolts, all the way up to several millivolts. bye, Said In a message dated 10/16/2008 10:49:45 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Said - To date there has been no data taken just on the EFC to see if there is any correlation. However, late last year a test was run for about 11 days on the Mini-T, without the antenna connected, and a slow downward drift was evident. In fact, the drift was such that the 11 Hz requirement, at 30 GHz, was easily met even though there may have been noise on the EFC. Like I said previously, I am in the process of fighting the 11 Hz requirement as I believe it is totally unrealistic. Even the spec of 1 KHz is unrealistic at the high data rates being used. But, since that can be easily met, at least for the time being, I am not ready to tackle that issue. I did receive one of those 1938A units from Rick, but have not had a chance to play with it yet. I think I mentioned in a previous post that John did contact me over the weekend and told me he retired 2 years ago. Now he is too involved with his new post as President of the IEEE starting in 2009. I was hoping he could help me fight this battle. We worked on some of the same issues together on and off in the last 25 or so years. I would definitely be interested in your unit. I assume then that it was also for a terminal to be used with the AF WGS satellite. Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.