Hal Murray wrote:
rich...@karlquist.com said:
I vaguely remember reading that pulsars have some fantastic stability
like 1E-20. I don't remember how they established this.
Do you remember how long ago you read that? It might have been some
handwaving back before they had good data.
For a while, the astronomers were seriously trying to take back the official
clock from the physicists. They didn't make it. I think a lot of the
interest started when somebody discovered a pulsar ticking at close to 1 KHz.
That was in 1982.
They have collected enough data to see things like star-quakes which are
glitches in the rotation rate due to geologic type shifts similar to the
recent discussion of 1.26 microseconds per day from the Chile quake.
They decay by gravitational radiation and speed up when accretion adds more
momentum and energy.
That's what I remember from reading the literature on pulsars as well. They act
a lot like quartz crystals, in fact, with frequency drift and frequency jumps.
In short, there is no macro-scale clock that will ever work as well as an atomic
clock, since an atomic clock depends on the behavior of subatomic particles with
a handful of state variables, whereas a macro-scale clock depends on the
behavior of large and changing lumps of disparate matter with gazillions of
state variables.
I realized as a teenager that the difficulty of predicting the future is
geometrically (or so) proportional to the number of state variables. So the
cesium clock is one of the few gadgets whose future behavior can be predicted to
any reasonable extent.
--David Forbes
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.