Food for thought.
I find it interesting that no one has suggested alternatives to
improving the performance of a pendulum clock other than controlling
it with a higher performance clock. If the goal is a better clock why
not attempt to understand the source of the errors and work on methods
to control or compensate for them? Teddy Hall has been taken to task
for using a quartz controlled oscillator to measure the amplitude of a
pendulum in the control loop of his Littlemore clock.
Tom Van Baak has developed techniques for analyzing the performance
and hence potential error sources of pendulum clocks - perhaps he will
share some of his work here.
Horological history is full of many attempts at solutions to the
problem, but it would seem that the creativity of this group might
generate some new ideas that are more in the spirit of better
timekeeping than attaching the pendulum to a better oscillator.
How about a wireless controlled device attached to the pendulum that
changes its position based on error sensor readings, not time errors,
but instead, temperature, barometric pressure, gravity, etc. that
would maintain a more constant pendulum period?
Bob Holmström
Editor
Horological Science Newsletter
www.hsn161.com
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
