I'm sure it's way, way better. Just ask them, they'll tell you... Even
if you could buy it of the shelf, how well would it perform in anything
but the reference design? Their envelopes look very, very good. In my
experience, the entire front end would need to be very carefully tuned.
On 3/9/2012 8:11 PM, David wrote:
I see a big lack of details. Form factor? Insertion loss? Frequency
change with temperature? How does it compare with a standard Murata
filters?
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:32:10 -0600, Michael Blazer
<mbla...@satx.rr.com> wrote:
Here's the link to the white paper:
http://javad.com/downloads/javadgnss/publications/20112312.pdf. It was
originally linked from GPS World's news email. It was originally posted
as a technical white paper. I don't recall the 'Political Noise' lead
in, but then, I'm a technical person and try to avoid political noise
anyway. After rereading it, it seems more like a 'I love me' piece.
Mike
On 3/8/2012 12:53 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
mbla...@satx.rr.com said:
I read a white paper Javad put out touting their new (and cheaper to build)
front end filter. Of course it is patented. So guess where everyone has
to go should LS get the green light.
Was that filter included as part of the recent round of testing? Did it work?
I don't remember seeing any grand press releases along the lines of "just use
our filter".
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
