Hi,

Oh yes. I remember a certain design from a certain vendor. It was an crystal oscillator, sort of. Available in many diverse frequencies (hint). It was really a crystal oscillator and a PLL that could be programmed relatively inexpensively. Solves many problems, so it's a fine product, but it is a no-go for gigabit serial links, such as fibre-channel, gigabit ethernet and the like, as the PLL caused some serious systematics. This systematics along with the noise was scaled up as the step-up PLL just did a wide-band step-up (as it should). The combination causes excessive bit-errors rendering the link quite unusefull. With the tools at my hand, a sub-sampling scope with some cool histogram capabilities I used a resistive divider and a coax delay so that I could measure the trigger point and also the 1 cycle jitter, which is essentially what dominates for this kind of setup. I could see the systematic jitter clearly this way, and I could also get numbers for the random jitter. The vendors rep said "you can't measure that!" where I insisted I could. We ended up using other products for that purpose. I ended up measuring many oscillators to approve their jitter properties.

So well yes, you learn the hard way what those 4-leggers do when you have a bit of requirements. Later I dug up the patent for the process, which was focused more on the production of one standard product and late setting the frequency for customer needs. For it's purpose a great concept, not for all cases thought.

I know of MEMS issues. One MEMS I measured was tossed into a lock-loop, but the noise of it made the scope-view completely smeared out, despite being locked on average. I only showed the scope, pointiing out it was locked and that was the end of that discussion.

There is nothing wrong with these devices for many purposes, but expect that it may not solve everything, so measure and learn what characteristics is important for that particular application.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 03/14/2017 04:02 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

Some (but not all) of the resonant structures in the MEMS parts are effectively 
multi
resonator / multi peak structures. Because of this the phase noise has multiple 
major
bumps in it as you get into the region of all the peaks. Thats not going to 
give you
great close in phase noise or ADEV. Since the manufacturers are often a bit 
unclear
on “what’s inside” you need be a bit careful as you sort through the different 
parts out
there. Even after sorting, you still run the risk of an “improved” design 
suddenly
replacing the one you decided on.

So much fun !!!

Bob

On Mar 14, 2017, at 8:39 AM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> 
wrote:

Hi,

Some claims that MEMS will kill crystals. It will surely eat a good market 
share, but I think there is applications where MEMS is not mature enough 
compared to crystals.

Another aspect is that various forms of synthesis technologies now exists, so 
that a high frequency CMOS oscillator is locked and divided down. Works 
sufficiently well for a whole bunch of applications.

Again, your milage may vary and there is applications where you need the real 
deal or the right stuff.

Cheers,
Magnus


On 03/14/2017 01:06 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:19 AM, Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

I think what he means is that the typical device sold today has four
terminals not two.  It looks like a crystal because it is inside a
little silver can but has four lead wires Power, ground and "output"
and the fourth lead might not be used.  It is an "XO" not an "X".

But I argue that every one of these device has a crystal inside.  So
they still make crystals, just you don't see them

These days, they may well have a MEMS resonator in them. No quartz and
no crystal. Good luck on the close in noise if that’s what they are doing ….

Bob


On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Bryan _ <bpl...@outlook.com> wrote:
sorry, what do you mean by "complete oscillator" have outnumbered loose 
crystals?


-=Bryan=-


________________________________
From: time-nuts <time-nuts-boun...@febo.com> on behalf of Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
<rich...@karlquist.com>
Sent: March 12, 2017 4:38 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Bye-Bye Crystals

I got a job in 1975 to design Konel's first synthesized radio, which
was to obsolete their crystal controlled radios.  That's over 40 years
ago.  The other trend (not mentioned) is that since 20 years ago or
so, complete oscillator sales have vastly outnumbered sales of loose
crystals.

Rick N6RK

On 3/11/2017 8:51 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

International’s main business  was re-channeling non-synthesized radios and 
replacing
broken crystals in various pieces of com gear. It’s been a *lot* of years since 
the last of the
non-synthesized radios came out. The business probably has been dropping off 
pretty steadily
for many years …

Bob

On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:39 PM, jimlux <jim...@earthlink.net> wrote:

On 3/11/17 4:30 PM, Scott McGrath wrote:
From the tone of the letter it sounds like the bank cancelled line of credit,

Or, he wants to retire and nobody wants to carry it on.  His dad started it in 
1950, the son picked it up in 1970.  It's 47 years later.


Which is stupid given that much of their line is military which is getting a 
huge boost in spending

Plenty of other crystal and oscillator manufacturers around.

There's also a change in what kinds of crystals are needed.   I suspect most things being built and 
designed today use the crystal as a "master oscillator" that is used to drive some sort 
of synthesis chain. The need for "I have to have a 12.345,324 Hz crystal" is going away.



On Mar 11, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Bryan _ <bpl...@outlook.com> wrote:

Disappearing or manufacturing just moving overseas?. Video at the bottom is 
interesting, classic.


http://hackaday.com/2017/03/11/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-crystals/
[https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVF.LElrlkkbByR3K%2f6qfaeHjg&pid=Api]<http://hackaday.com/2017/03/11/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-crystals/>

So Long, and Thanks for all the 
Crystals<http://hackaday.com/2017/03/11/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-crystals/>
hackaday.com
There was a time when anyone involved with radio transmitting -- ham operators, 
CB'ers, scanner enthusiasts, or remote control model fans -- had a collection 
of ...






-=Bryan=-
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
time-nuts Info Page - American Febo 
Enterprises<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
www.febo.com
time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior 
postings to ...



and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
time-nuts Info Page - American Febo 
Enterprises<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
www.febo.com
time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior 
postings to ...



and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
time-nuts Info Page - American Febo 
Enterprises<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
www.febo.com
time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior 
postings to ...



and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
time-nuts Info Page - American Febo 
Enterprises<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts>
www.febo.com
time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior 
postings to ...



and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to