George Ross wrote: > As I said, if the project decides to impose constraints on other > services which our timeserver addresses respond to then we'll > simply decide to leave the pool. I expect the addresses > which are currently in the pool will continue to respond > to NTP. I would be surprised if we're the only large > site to think that way.
As an AOLer would've written a decade ago "ME TOO". I'm glad to provide NTP service to whoever wants it, and in fact have two independent-sourced (one CHU, one GPS) stratum 1 servers, but if anyone starts making up new rules then they're welcome to drop me. Besides, we all know that this "web" is just a flash in the pan and that NTP will continue to be used long after the web has been replaced with Vulcan Mind-Meld or whatever comes next! Tim. _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
