@Donald: That makes more sense. I should just need to enable IP fowarding and some routes, and then magic happens. (That's all I did on the windows box that has everything working the way I want it to be.)
I'll give that a shot. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:35 PM, vmlinux <[email protected]> wrote: >> Where 192.168.99.x and 172.16.253.x are the local non-tinc subnets and >> 10.10.10.x are tinc addresses. >> > > Hmm.. I don't think you can bridge the 192.x and 172.x networks. They > need to have the same IP address range/netmask. You could probably > work some hocus-pocus with Netfilter in the nat table between but > that could be a substantial performance hit depending on traffic. > _______________________________________________ > tinc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc _______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
