On Friday 20 June 2008 20:16, KHMan wrote: > I'm sure there was no intention to engage in FUD. Since I believe > embedding was assumed when replying to the OP, the license change > for GPL Tiny CC had to be mentioned, it was unavoidable. Others on > the list saw nothing unusual. So it's a statement of fact that > needs to be presented to the OP so that he is informed and is > clear about the available choices.
Yes, I was under the impression the OP wanted to embed the compiler as an integral part of his application to prototype plugins as scripts and in no way did I want to spread any FUD. --Ivo _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
