Дана 25/08/09 11:16AM, [email protected] написа: > Full C99 or C11 support ? C11 is safer and more "up to date" : > > https://web.archive.org/web/20200806193736/https://smartbear.com/blog/test-and-monitor/c11-a-new-c-standard-aiming-at-safer-programming/ > > Hence C11 should be getting way more prevalent in the existing source code > out there :
C99 is the version of C standard which is preferred by the suckless movement. I think that the current main goal of tcc development should be focused on full support for C99. Core values behind tcc - simplicity, efficiency and frugality in software - are shared with the suckless movement, so having a simple, fast and efficient complete C99 compiler would benefit the community more than diverting attention to the simultaneous development of C11 features. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
