Дана 25/08/10 02:10PM, [email protected] написа: > Let's say C99 should be covered indeed, 25 years in the making, but > C11 shouldn't be ditched.
That wasn't what I proposed, but that the current focus should be full C99 compliance. There is a number of ways how the future support for other versions of C standard after full C99 compliance is achieved could be handled. For example, having separate branches or different subprojects to support different versions of the standard. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
