On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 01:31:45PM -0700, Charles Lohr wrote: > It is crucial for TCC to remain as simple, fast, and have the smallest > footprint possible. ... > Mature codebases already use > compiler-specific work-arounds and tweaks, so being "fully C11 > compliant" doesn't actually buy you anything. ... > And for my purposes is a > strict loss of suitability (because of the added code burdin).
+1 to the whole text. There are of course also codebases which deliberately assume a specific advanced language version or even a specific implementation of the toolchain, but they are by their choice and their design not the target area of Tinycc, as long as "tiny" is rightfully kept in the name. > I urge you please do not become obsessed with some sort of > completionist death march. Well said, thank you Charles. /tccm _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
