Hello, most probably because I not even received it back into my own mailbox :)
Yet the links are on topic, hard to know how to provide them using another way. At least the message is conveyed to the rightful recipient, even if considered as "spam". Regards. ----- Mail d'origine ----- De: Bruno Castro <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Envoyé: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 15:03:26 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : VERSION Number I david, I think it can be due to the amount of links in this email but I got it in my spam inbox. Kindest regards. On Thu, Aug 7, 2025, 08:52 <[email protected]> wrote: > To be debugged from nasty flaws (see messages in the list) and fully pass > conformance test suites : > > https://solidsands.com/products/supertest > > https://www.nullstone.com/htmls/ns-c.htm > > https://plumhall.com/newsite/index.html > > https://solidsands.com/a-compiler-test-suite-thats-built-for-the-job > > https://www.opengroup.org/testing/testsuites/perenial.htm > > > https://github.com/nlsandler/writing-a-c-compiler-tests > > https://github.com/c-testsuite/c-testsuite > > ... > > Otherwise you cannot rely on the compiler's output. > > Compiler optimization is another topic entirely. > > Regards. > > > ----- Mail d'origine ----- > De: Robin Rowe <[email protected]> > À: [email protected] > Envoyé: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 07:34:39 +0200 (CEST) > Objet: [Tinycc-devel] VERSION Number > > Question about version numbering... > > Version 0.9.27 was released in 2017. The current version # is 0.9.28rc. > What is needed to get TCC to version 1.0? > > Robin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
