[email protected] wrote in
 <[email protected]>:
 |On 10.01.2026 17:38, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> [email protected] wrote in
 |>   <[email protected]>:
 |>|On 09.01.2026 14:25, Herman ten Brugge wrote:
 |>|> On 1/9/26 12:57, grischka wrote:
 |>|>> On 09.01.2026 08:04, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel wrote:
 |>   ...
 |>|> I still think we should fix the i386 alignment.
 |>|
 |>|So...
 |>|- by "the i386 alignment" you mean alignment of 'double' and 'long \
 |>|long' on i386,
 |>|- and by "we should fix" you mean us to assume a bug in TCC,
 |>|- and by "I still think" you mean to substitute the still missing \
 |>|arguments
 |>|   for that assumption.
 |>|
 |>|Is that correct? ;)
 |>
 |> I am thankful To Herman for all the work he does, just to mention
 |> this.  Also to you, of course.  But i got the gut feeling you are
 |> now pissing around.
 |>
 |> --steffen
 |
 |Hopefully you're feeling well again at the guts?

\o/

 |Still, I'm afraid that without some analysis on a more rational
 |level we won't make much progress on the matter, like is is a bug
 |or an optional feature, why should we fix it or implement, what
 |would it take, what would be the benefits, etc...
 |
 |-- gr
 --End of <[email protected]>

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to