thin-air wrote: > ... I decided to put my money on the Python horse for winning the future ...
Although other systems have their own advantages, I don't think that this would be a wrong decision! thin-air wrote: > ... also, I decided that PostgresQL was much more reliable and safer to use > than MySQL ... You may be right, but there is more to a database than its technical advantage (as greno has expounded in these forums). So ... you could stick to Postgres but use some form of abstraction to connect to it uisng standard SQL so that you can replace postgres by Oracle / DB2 / MySQL, etc, if you ever need to. Regards, Geoff ------------------------ Seath Solutions Ltd (http://www.seathsolutions.com) _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users
