Hi Jon,

On 28/11/16 14:53, Jon Maloy wrote:
>> I saw your patch "tipc: fix link statistics counter errors". I assume it 
>> should
>> > tackle this issue? I gave it a try with kernel 4.9.0-rc7 on my kmeter1 
>> > board
>> > which is a 32 bit powerpc board. Unfortunately the counters are still 
>> > wrong in
>> > the link statistic. Received packets don't appear at all and transmitted
>> > packages to a remote node are accounted on the broadcast link.
> I believe you are talking only about the broadcast link here? The figures for
> broadcast reception are currently missing by design, i.e., they have always
> been missing. We would need to scan across all broadcast reception links (on
> the contrary, there is only one broadcast transmission link, which makes that
> task easy) and accumulate all values, as well as presenting the figures for
> the individual links. It is not a particularly big or difficult task, but it
> is certainly more than the small bug corrections I just delivered. I cannot
> prioritize this myself right now.

no I am not talking about the broadcast link in particular, it was only another
thing I noticed.

I have a TIPC link between two ethernet ports and I send packets connectionless
from a client to a server running on the other side of the link.  And what I
still see is that the RX and TX counter are not increasing in the link
statistic. After sending 300 packets with a size of 10kB I see:

Link <1.1.9:eth2-1.1.211:eth1>
  ACTIVE  MTU:1500  Priority:10  Tolerance:1500 ms  Window:50 packets
  RX packets:6 fragments:0/0 bundles:0/0
  TX packets:4 fragments:0/0 bundles:0/0
  TX profile sample:2 packets  average:60 octets
  0-64:100% -256:0% -1024:0% -4096:0% -16384:0% -32768:0% -66000:0%
  RX states:17978 probes:368 naks:0 defs:2 dups:2
  TX states:17772 probes:17386 naks:2 acks:16 dups:0
  Congestion link:0  Send queue max:0 avg:0

I just wanted to know that this is a known bug or if there is something wrong in
my setup.

Best regards
Holger

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tipc-discussion mailing list
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion

Reply via email to